Here's the backstory to this post: I went and saw The Dark Knight
Rises this past Saturday, but I really am having a hard time determining
how I feel about the movie overall. I can definitively say the movie
was not bad, but I cannot definitively say the movie was good... I just
feel like there are some things bothering me about the movie. What I've
decided to do, to help rectify this, is to go back and watch the
previous 2 Nolan Batman movies and analyzing what I think works, what I
think doesn't work. Also, I'm going to try and keep my thoughts focused
on the Nolan Batman movies, because some of my frustrations I think came
from conflicts between them and the comics.
I started this off by rewatching Batman Begins, and full-disclosure:
this is the first time I've watched the movie since I saw it in
theatres. I know my initial thoughts on the movie were that I liked it,
but I remember having some reservations about it.
Overall Feelings
I definitely liked this movie more the second time. Taking this in as
part of the trilogy really makes this movie stronger. I really think
they established how Bruce Wayne became Batman well in this movie,
making you understand all the elements that led to this. I liked the
movie a lot, so let's look at the elements that worked and didn't.
What Works
Michael Caine gives a tremendous performance as Alfred, really showing a
true compassion that helps keep both Bruce Wayne and the audience
grounded. He basically is the moral compass, and you can feel the
influence from his character even when he's not on screen.
Christian Bale does a great job in both roles, and you can see that he
becomes more comfortable with the Batman role throughout the movies,
which makes sense.
The story is very well paced and easy to follow, despite having four
different points in time that are part of the movie (Bruce's childhood,
his confrontation with the mob, his self-imposed exile, his return.)
Nolan also uses each scene to help build towards many of the
character-defining moments for Bruce Wayne/Batman.
Morgan Freeman as Lucius Fox works really well, as he and Christian Bale
both play off each other really well. To be fair, Morgan Freeman is
awesome in almost everything.
Liam Neeson as Henri Ducard/Ra's Al Ghul actually works really well with
how they establish the League of Shadows in Nolan's Batman-verse. The
League consists of members recruited from many difference cultures and
societies, ever growing as the world changes. Also, the statement about
Ra's Al Ghul's immortality is handled differently. Where in the comic
books, Ra's was actually immortal, in Nolan's world it is a title held by
whomever the leader of the League of Shadows is. As I said, this works
quite well.
Cillian Murphy as Dr. Johnathan Crane/the Scarecrow is an excellent
choice. The way they actually made the Scarecrow work in a realistic
environment is awesome and is legitimately freaky. Also, Murphy is just a
blast to watch as he plays this role.
Gotham's populace is very much a part of this movie. You constantly see
the people everywhere, and you see them interacting with the movie in a
variety of ways. It makes the city feel like... well, a city.
Tom Wilkinson as Carmine Falcone is another great casting choice, as his
speech he gave to Bruce Wayne in the restaurant was a great example of
how to set up the way a character will develop. He clearly enjoyed
playing the character, which made it all the more fun.
Gary Oldman as Jim Gordan is fantastic. The way he plays a good cop in
the middle of corruption makes his performance feel very genuine. He
comes across as an incorruptible good guy who isn't afraid to be
unconventional. He also has some great interactions with Christian
Bale's Batman throughout, and you can tell they work well together.
The third act is phenomenal. The way everything comes together in the
end, the way every plot point actually has an effect on the conclusion,
it is exceptional writing from Nolan. There was plenty of tension, the
stakes felt high, and everything felt like it was really building up to
the confrontation between Batman and Al Ghul.
The revelation of the Joker as the next villain really helped build
excitement for the next movie right away, and obviously the pay off was
great, but I'll save that for the next movie.
What Doesn't Work
Katie Holmes as Rachael Dawes. She really doesn't have any chemistry
with anyone, and she really doesn't seem to be invested in the
character. The lines she has are pretty good, but her delivery falls
flat in most cases.
The end of the Scarecrow was one of the weaker ends to a supervillian. I
get that they established that Rachel carries a taser and I get that
Scarecrow isn't a fighter. But, one of the most intimidating and
psychological villains in the Batman universe was taken out by being
shot in the face by a taser. That's... kind of anticlimactic.
Finch, Rachel's boss and someone they hint might have a romantic
attachment (or at least a fatherly attachment) to Rachel is dropped
without resolution. Yes, we see him get killed, but it still feels like a
dropped (and therefore, unnecessary) plot point. You could just as
easily had a generic cop that was checking the manifest get killed off,
it would've had the same impact. Minor gripe.
Final Thoughts
As I said, Batman Begins is a really good way to launch into Batman,
especially if you've never really seen a Batman movie before. I could
get into all kinds of debates about weather Christian Bale was better
than Michael Keaton, was Nolan's Batman Begins better than Tim Burton's
Batman, but ultimately that's not what I'm focusing on. If you want a
really good Batman origin story and a great way to kick off a trilogy,
you could sure do a helluva lot worse than this. Solid thumbs up.
We will be back tomorrow looking at The Dark Knight. I'm really looking forward to rewatching it again, so stay tuned!
No comments:
Post a Comment